Back to Projects

Formula SAE Chassis Structural Analysis

ANSYS Innovation Space — Completed Guided Simulation Course

ANSYS Mechanical Vehicle Structures Load Case Development Motorsports Engineering Beam Elements

Project Overview

This project focuses on structural analysis of a Formula SAE tubular spaceframe chassis using ANSYS Mechanical. The objective was to develop correct modeling workflows for motorsport applications, including geometry preparation, load case definition, and interpretation of structural response.

While the baseline chassis geometry was provided as part of an ANSYS instructional course, all geometry cleanup, tube property assignment, boundary conditions, and load applications were completed independently to mirror real-world motorsport analysis practices.

Tools & Methods ANSYS Mechanical · Beam element modeling · Geometry cleanup · Load case development · Torsional stiffness evaluation · Boundary condition development

Geometry Preparation

The chassis was imported into ANSYS SpaceClaim as a line-body network representing the tubular steel members. Geometry was cleaned to remove false intersections and redundant connections, and cross-section properties were assigned per tube diameter and wall thickness prior to meshing.

Formula SAE chassis geometry in SpaceClaim Cleaned chassis line geometry in ANSYS SpaceClaim with tubular cross-sections assigned.

Load Cases Analyzed

Four primary structural scenarios were evaluated to represent real competition loading conditions:

Torsional Stiffness

Opposing vertical forces were applied at the front suspension pickup points while the rear was constrained, loading the chassis in twist. Torsional stiffness evaluation provides a baseline for comparing chassis design iterations and identifying members that contribute most to overall rigidity.

Torsional load case deformation Total deformation under opposing corner loads — torsional stiffness evaluation.

Cornering

Lateral g-load was distributed across the frame to simulate the chassis response during high-speed cornering. Results were reviewed for asymmetric deformation patterns and identification of members carrying the highest lateral loads.

Cornering load case deformation Total deformation under lateral cornering load — g-load distribution across spaceframe.

Aerodynamic Downforce

Vertical downforce loads were applied at the front and rear aerodynamic attachment points to evaluate chassis bending response and load transfer to the suspension pickups under high-speed aerodynamic loading.

Aerodynamic downforce deformation Total deformation under aerodynamic downforce loading at front and rear attachment points.

Frontal Impact

A forward deceleration load was applied at the front bulkhead while the rear structure was constrained, simulating the chassis response during a frontal collision event. Results highlight load transfer paths through the primary structure and stress concentrations at major frame joints.

Frontal impact total deformation Total deformation under frontal impact loading — load transfer through primary spaceframe members. Frontal impact bending stress Bending stress distribution under frontal impact — stress concentrations at major joint intersections.

Key Takeaways

The primary value of this project was establishing a repeatable workflow for motorsport structural analysis — from geometry import through load case execution and results interpretation. Torsional stiffness evaluation in particular established useful baselines for comparing chassis design iterations.

Working through the ANSYS guided course also reinforced the importance of boundary condition selection and the sensitivity of beam element models to cross-section property accuracy. These workflows are directly applicable to the Shell Eco-Marathon chassis development work currently underway.